OFFICIAL RECOGNITION OF THE RETALIATED PROTECTIVE MOTHER PROBLEM AND THE ROLE "PAS" PLAYS IN THESE PROBLEMS.
Many articles have been published in major media, on-line news and commentary sites such as WorldNetDaily, WomensENews and professional an advocacy sites including the National Organization for Women.
Victims should know that the fathers rights' movement and Parental Alienation
Syndrome (PAS) were created by a ring of judges to stir-up domestic litigation
and use that litigation as a extortion/protection scheme against vulnerable women who are
worried about the safety of their children. Abusive men are given
"protection" in exchange for their cooperation in non-stop profitable litigation activity.
Viewing the malicious court conduct by the judge a result of "bias" or
"good-old-boy" local cronyism is a serious mistake which will prevent
you from learning how to deal with the bad court professional and make them stop
exploiting you.
While the articles below are useful reviews of what
is wrong with "PAS", none of them touch on the most compelling error in
the PAS methodology model, which is - it purports to be a method for identifying instances
of one parent alienating a child from the other parent. However, the PAS authors
do not describe any child (or mother) behavior which could be labeled an alienated conduct.
Instead, their entire focus is on something else - sex acts with
children. A mother's complaints against the father for sexual activity
with the child, is the sole criteria for the author's strong condemnations
against the mother for causing the child to be alienated from the father.
The PAS authors believe a child is made to fear the fathers' sexual activities,
when absent the complaint everything would be fine. Nothing is said about what factors would constituent a
valid sex abuse complaint. All the reactions by the mother which they label as "alienating" are normal reactions to discovering her child was
being abused.
Additional discrediting factors are: Gardner/Underwager analysis model has no identifying factors
for a truly "false" allegation. The sum of their writings really
say, is that the mother should keep her mouth shut and not interfere
because there is really nothing wrong with sex between fathers and children. The
only real harm occurs when the mother makes the child think there is something
wrong with the sex activity. The fact that hundreds of people have
read, absorbed and endorsed the Gardner / Underwager sex theories gives
evidence to how many sex perverts (both male and female) there are in our society. Furthermore, the fact that hundreds more have read and critically
reacted to their pro-incest writings but haven't labeled them for what they
really are - is an indication of how fearful the rest of society is about
violating taboos against acknowledging grown men actually do have sex with their
own children and are proud of it. Even the most outspoken critics of PAS
can not bring themselves to say publicly what they all should know is obvious -
that Gardner, Underwager, Farrell and their fathers rights followers are a bunch of sex perverts. The
bottom line is that subject of incest is still very much a social taboo and the
incest crowd knows this and plays on this social taboo to its own advantage hiding
behind "parental alienation" and other cover theories to keep their
critics distracted. Even worse this crowd
has taken matters one step further and made incest (under the cover of
alienation and visitation interference) an official government social program, under the
guise of helping
fathers see and have good relations with their children.
Never
underestimate the ability of a government bureaucrats to play dumb about other
peoples' problems and exploit it to the hilt in the name of helping those
people.
Articles published in Washington Times by NAFCJ leader Liz Richards describe
these factor in more detail:
Washington
Times | April 2006 |"The other side of fathers' rights controversy"
Washington
Times | April 2008 | "Parental rights and wrongs"
Article published in Northern
Virginia community newspaper in 2003, and posted on French Canadian site.
"Program
produces mother less kids" by Liz Richards
Kinsey-Sexual deviancy expert, Judith Reisman has
written frequently on this topic for
WorldNewsDaily, going back to a 1999 article in which she mentions Liz Richards and NAFCJ
- Texas activist, Jan Barstow.
Reisman was the source of the
PAIDIKA article which exposed Ralph Underwager pro-pedophilia opinions.
Dr.
Judith Reisman
WorldNetDaily:
Child custody for sex offenders / April 1999
WorldNetDaily:
Child abuse and child custody- March 1999
WorldNetDaily
News Archives: Judith Reisman
Leadership Council, founded by psychological professionals, has done extensive work researching PAS.
The
Leadership Council: What is Parental Alienation Syndrome
The
Leadership Council - Homepage
Leadership
Council / Dr. Joy Silberg
The
Leadership Council - Articles on Abuse and Custody
Leadership Council member, Stephanie Dallam, has written some of the best
articles exposing Gardner & PAS as pro-incest. Look for the section
titled "Therapy for the Mother", in which Gardner offers the
disgusting advice to therapists treating an "incest" family. Gardner
says the mother should be encouraged to use a vibrator so the father won't have
to seek sex from his daughter. Most of what Gardner writes actually justifies incest and blames the problem on the mother or the victimized
child. This is the basis of "PAS" and the strongest reason
why PAS is not valid.
Stephanie
Dallam: "Parents losing custody to abusers"
Marin County Calif. based advocacy / reform group
Center
for Judicial Excellence convinced California state legislators to conduct
investigations of widespread mishandling of custody litigation.
.
California
orders audit of Marin County family court | 2009
Geffner:
Custody Disputes Often Bypass Abuse Assessments
From
the "What Took Them So-Long" category, is this Department of Justice,
June 2009 release of remarks by Attorney General Holder which include: "Why
are mothers who are the victims of domestic violence losing custody of their
children to the courts and to the child protection system? "
Remarks
by Attorney General Eric Holder June 2009
American Judges Association
Studies
show batterers convince authorities that the victim is unfit, undeserving of
sole custody in approximately 70% of challenged cases and that in approximately
one-half of abusive families, some form of physical and/or sexual abuse of
children exists.
This article is about Pennsylvania judges exposed and convinced in a similar
court-based scheme using their control of children for financial kickbacks.
PA.Judges
Plead Guilty in Scheme to Jail Youths for Profit - NYTimes.com
Kim
Gandy/N.O.W.article on Gardner " Sick Joke or Sick Reality?"
N.O.W.
"The Crisis in Family Law Courts"
CA NOW
Family Law Task Force to investigate and reform
corruption and gender bias in the courts; reported included information
from our group NAFCJ.
Jana Bommersbach, Phoenix Mag, May 2006, critical article on PAS
Battered
Mothers Custody Conference
Garland
Waller |Biased Family Court System Hurts Mothers| WomensNews
Stop
Family Violence - Protective Mothers file complaint with Inter American
Commission on Human Rightst
Stop
Family Violence - Breaking The Silence PBS documentary
VNET -
Violence Against Women Net
Chamber
of Secrets,
Child Custody
corruption exposed, CBS 48 Hours
NAFCJ associates and leaders
Michigan
National Organization for Women, Renee Beeker
Illinois Council for Family Court Reform
Michelle
Bryon-Egan story
NAFCJ associates: advocates & experts who deal with incest survivor
issues:
Jill
Jones Soderman /Psychodiagnostic & Psychotherapeutic
Hope4KidZ
California
Protective Parents Association
PAS
UNMASKED AS A BLATANT INCEST PROMOTION SCHEME
THE PRIMARY
SOURCE OF THE PRO-MALE, PRO-PEDOPHILIA COURT METHODOLOGY IS A RING OF
PUBLISHED INCEST PROMOTERS, LEAD BY DR. RICHARD GARDNER, Ralph Underwager
and Warren Farrell - all closely associated with the fathers rights movement.
(Gardner & Underwager died in 2002)
Underwager was a CRC founding
board official. Farrell was a founding board official of the three principle
fathers rights groups.
Farrell is still very active with all the fathers rights groups and makes
frequent media appearances on their behalf.
Gardner was
a frequent speaker at fathers rights events and appeared as an
"expert" witness in their cases until a lengthy discrediting article was
published in the Pittsburgh-Post Gazette. Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette|"Casualties of a Custody Wars"| Nathan Greico-Scott
The "fall-out" from this very critical review, caused Gardner to
stop appearing as a expert witness for fathers in the custody litigation and
"drop-out" of public view. It wasn't until his "strange"
suicide death in 2003, did the media take an even closer negative look at this
perverted practices.
Gardner's death
was ruled a "suicide" by the Bergen County,
New Jersey coroner office. However a careful reading of the medical
examiners autopsy report, described wounds very unlikely to be self-inflicted - e.g. multiple stabs in his
heart and multiple slits on his throat. This factor plus our knowledge of inconsistent comments from Gardner's family ,
and violent fathers rights activists, indicated he was really killed and everybody covered it up - including the
N.J. police
and medical examiner, his family and his fathers rights allies & admirers.
It is not believable that a 70-year old man in supposedly ill health could slit
his own throat several times and then stab his own chest several times, and
finally sink a 7" knife blade into his own heart !!!
CincinnatiPAS site
,by Ohio based
activists who were forced to go "anonymous" because of retaliatory
threats of their very explicit expose of Gardner and the "fake"
suicide.
Dr.
Richard Gardner | CincinnatiPAS-front page
At the bottom of this site is scanned copies of the New
Jersey medical examiner's report which reveals the truth about his 'suicide'.:
Dr.
Richard Gardner MD - autoposy report
Gardner
- PAS Caselaw
This is a
great "spoof" article written by NAFCJ
member Karen Anderson of N. California about Gardner's crazy theories.
Syndromes
R Us ltr to Richard Gardner -- July 1999
WARREN
FARRELL, ANOTHER FATHER'S RIGHTS ASSOCIATE.
HIS 1977 PENTHOUSE, "POSITIVE
INCEST" INTERVIEW IS LOADED WITH PRO-INCEST
COMMENTS WHICH FARRELL TRIED FOR YEARS TO DENY. Dr.
Warren Farrell
Scroll down to the mid-point of the linked article below, to the section describing the
"purported" actions of 40
year-old writer who seduced his teen daughter at the family beach house as she
came out of the bathroom. This and other sections gives us an
"insight" into the depraved minds of these people.
Farrell tried for years to cover up his own published statements by making false claims
about a one word "misquote". He gave up on this cover-up tactic after Liz
Richards distributed excerpts of his many other deviant remarks. WARREN
FARRELL - GENITALLY CARESSING CHILDREN
RALPH UNDERWAGER OF MINNESOTA IS ANOTHER FATHERS
RIGHTS AFFILIATED INCEST/PEDOPHILIA PROMOTER.
Underwager was also closely
associated with the fathers rights (a founding board member of CRC) until he
resigned after exposure of his pro-pedophilia interview published in the Dutch based journal "PAIDIKA",
which labels itself as "The Official Journal for Advocating the Lifestyle of the
Pedophile."
This article was discovered and analyzed by
researcher Judith Reisman (see above)
Ralph
Underwager Home
Page of the IPT - Institute for Psychological Therapies
PAIDIKA
INTERVIEW: HOLLIDA WAKEFIELD AND RALPH UNDERWAGER
PROFESSIONAL REPORTS
DISCREDITING PAS:
The
following are professional publications with have discredited Gardner
and PAS:
The National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse, based in Alexandria, VA
was one of the first to explore the misuse of PAS in evaluating sex abuse in
court cases - both civil and criminal. After both Gardner & Underwager
died, NCPCA staff felt free from potential harassment and issued the following
double-edition report.
NCPCA-
Newsletters
NCPCA
Update Newsletter Volume 16, Number 6, 2003
NCPCA
Update Newsletter Volume 16, Number 7, 2003
National Council
of Juvenile and Family Court Judges [anti-PAS]
Guide, "The discredited "diagnosis" of "PAS"
(or allegation of "parental alienation"), quite apart from its scientific
invalidity, inappropriately asks the court to assume that the children's
behaviors and attitudes toward the parent who claims to be "alienated" have no
grounding in reality. It also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the
abusive parent, who may have directly influenced the children's responses by
acting in violent, disrespectful, intimidating, humiliating and/or discrediting
ways toward the children themselves, or the children's other parent. "
American Judges Association Studies show batterers convince authorities that the victim is unfit, undeserving of sole custody in approximately 70% of challenged cases and that in approximately one-half of abusive families, some form of physical and/or sexual abuse of children exists.
Model Code of the Family Violence Project, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCFCJ, 1998) "rebuttable presumption that it is detrimental to the child, not in the best interest of the child to be placed in sole custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody with the perpetrator of family violence"
Beware of Family Court: What Victims and Advocates Should Know, by Women's Justice Center
Carol Brush 2001 Analysis of PAS
STILL
FEEL CONFUSED AND HELPLESS ? ?
THEN CALL LIZ AT 703/658-3543 FOR MORE DETAILED
TIPS.
Or E-mail her at: LizGoal@aol.com