|
Featured in Region |
![]()
Yager, Her Ilk Are No Friends To Children
By BETHE
DUFRESNE
Day Staff Columnist
Published on 7/11/2003
So Bonnie Rubenstein, acquitted last month of custodial
interference after five years on the run with her young son, wants to work with
kids.
The former school psychologist told a Day reporter that
once her family court battles are over, she hopes to resume her career, perhaps
as a children's advocate.
If so, it's unlikely she'll list
Rubenstein didn't answer my request to talk to her about
Yager. But several years ago I got a chance to see the two in tandem when a
1997 tape of Yager interviewing Rubenstein and her then 3-year-old son was
provided to The Day.
As the child cringed, cried and screamed, Yager and
Rubenstein, who held and patted her son, tried to cajole or trick him into
saying his father had abused him, even menacing him with a big stuffed
dinosaur.
“Is that Daddy?” asked Yager, shoving the toy at the boy,
who naturally hit back. “Give him another one!” exhorted Yager. “Does that make
you feel better when you bop Daddy?”
“Daddy's coming to get you!” intoned Rubenstein.
What I saw looked misguided and cruel. But for an informed
opinion, I took the tape to experts in child abuse, who provided a list of do's
and don'ts when interviewing a child. Among the major don'ts: Prompting. Threatening. Lying.
Suffice it to say that Yager and Rubenstein did them all.
What struck me as most frightening, however, was the sense that both women,
with their stern but silken voices, actually felt qualified to do what they
were doing.
I don't believe professionals have all the answers. But
what I saw on that tape, and later on another, violated professional ethics,
common sense and human compassion.
The other tape was of Yager interviewing — or, more
accurately interrogating — a 7-year-old boy and his 5-year-old sister.
“You know some things about your Daddy you're afraid to
tell us, right?” Yager, in fancy dress and pearls, asked the weeping boy, clad
only in shorts or underpants while seated on an elegant white Victorian couch.
“Well, I want you to tell me.”
Yager tried to get the girl to implicate other males in the
father's family, then helped her reconstruct a sordid
degradation ritual. After prodding her into reciting how her Daddy had made her
eat “poo-poo,” Yager asked if Daddy had made her eat
anything else bad.
“Chinese food,” the distraught child replied.
Vicki Pierce, a mothers' advocate and National Organization
for Women leader from Cobb County, Ga., who knew and became disillusioned with
Yager, said Thursday claims of Satanism and other ritualistic abuse often
surface where Yager is involved.
Pierce said she wasn't surprised to read that Rubenstein
claimed to have found cuts around her son's penis, or that Dr. Charles Nord of
Ironically, that Yager made tapes of her interviews
suggests she thought they would justify her helping women flee the law. On
tape, Rubenstein told her son it was “very, very important” that he tell how
his father had hurt him.
No doubt some of Yager's clients really were in danger. But
no one who has seen Yager's amateur, self-serving interrogations could call her
a savior or a martyr, and anyone who follows her is no friend to children.
“We're going to show you how to tell the truth,” Yager told
the 5-year-old girl, “and get folks to believe you.”
You don't have to be an expert to read the horror in those
words.
This is the opinion of Bethe Dufresne. ![]()
© The Day Publishing Co., 2003